Hand Cat Wife

Dear Readers, please note that this story is meant to be contained within a single paragraph.

How to begin. That is the difficulty. There are always innumerable points of entry. And the point of entry need not necessarily be the beginning. The beginning can situate itself at the beginning. I mean our point of entry can be the beginning, if that is the way it works. I only mean to begin by stating that it is unnecessary for it to be so. So where do I begin? My birth? No. Let us never speak of it again. In any case, I do not remember it sufficiently. Other things. Now my hand is healthy. Now it is withered. The passage from the healthy state to the withered state, now that is a story. But I will not tell it. I might tell it. At least not yet. Let it be known only that it happened gradually, by degrees. You see my difficulty though. Wherever I begin the problem remains. How do I relate this point to that point? My withered hand to the disappearance of the cat. Not that I have any hold over it of course. Cats do as they please. Not like dogs. Now dogs, they are pathetic animals. No pride. No courage. That is anthropomorphic, I know. In both cases. The cat and the dog. I do not remember when I learnt that word. Nor from where. I like it though. More than most words. I haven’t much time for words, after all. And with this hand it is difficult to write. But for whatever reason I write. And I struggle for a beginning. The words to begin. What about the cat. It is black. At least it was black. Whether it remains so is anybody’s guess. Things change after all. Like my hand. My hand has changed from healthy to withered. The cat too, has changed. The cat has changed from present to absent. If the cat can change from present to absent then who is to say that it cannot change from black to white? The wife too. She changed. She changed from alive to dead. Another interesting transformation from one state to another. She was alive. She was dead. Some change is reversible. The cat, for example, might come back. I hope it is well. But they tell me that the wife cannot become a living person now that she is a dead person. This change is apparently irreversible, so that the most I can hope for is the safe return of the cat. I am aware of the possibility, of course, that the cat might too be dead, in which case the most I can hope for is that they are wrong in what they tell me, that the passage from a living state to a dead state is irreversible. And if I can hope for that then I can hope for the return of both the cat and the wife. As for the hand, I have no idea if the condition it is in is reversible or not. They refuse to tell me. They do not say yes. They do not say no. They do not say that they do not know. They say that they cannot tell me, from which I infer that they may or may not know, but that whether or not they do is irrelevant, for its revelation through the medium of speech is out of the question. Have I told you that I have a dislike for words? Not all of them. I have to admit that some have an appealing sound. Pause, for example. I say it again, for the sheer frivolous pleasure of the whole thing. Pause. It amuses me how I must pause in order to utter such a sound. But writing it does nothing for me. It is the sound I like. Nothing to do with signification. And in any case, it is more painful for me to write that word than any other. I do not know why. Something about the shapes of the letters and their specific order of combination aggravates my disability in a particularly aggressive manner, volatile as it is anyway. So I shall just utter the sound to myself as I write, avoiding if at all possible the requirement to write it down, and replacing it with a different but equally suitable word for those times when I wish to express such a notion. Break, for example. It does not hurt the hand so much to write that word. A sensitive issue, the hand. I wish to inform you about it, about the passage from the healthy state to the withered state, but it is a difficult story to tell. It started with just a finger. No, a finger nail. I do not remember which one. The smallest, yes, but which one that was I cannot determine. My memory is not good, you see. That is another interesting change. Just as my hand became withered, having previously been healthy, my memory became bad, having previously been good. And when my memory was good, my hand was healthy. And when my memory became bad, my hand became withered. That is the order in which it happened, insofar as I remember. And as to the relationship between the passage from a good memory to a bad memory, and the passage from a healthy hand to a withered hand, I have no idea. There were other things too. I had a cat. A black cat. And a wife too. She is dead now. I do not remember how, but it might come back to me. The cat might come back too. I do not know for how long it has been gone. Which went first? The cat or the wife? Or the memory? There are leaflets for the cat. Leaflets with a photograph, only the cat in the photograph is white. The wife distributed the leaflets. That was before she became dead. The cat must have gone first then. That is only reasonable. Several people contacted me offering information about the cat, but nothing came of it. My hand was healthy then. I believe. I have no evidence for that. A bit like the cat. No photograph, you see. That is why the photograph on the leaflet is of a white cat. That must be the reason. The wife is another story. I have a photograph of her. Before she died. On her deathbed. It was in a hospital I think. It looks that way. She looks dead. Perhaps she was. Myself too, sitting beside her. I don’t suppose I could have been dead at that point, unless they are wrong when they tell me that a dead person cannot become a living person. They are emphatic on this point, which makes me think that if they are incorrect about it, then they are either ignorant or lying. I have no way to tell, so I take their word for it. Provisionally, that is, and with a degree of scepticism befitting someone in my position, a position of which I have only a vague notion. I know that my hand is withered, and that this condition makes it difficult for me to write. I have two hands. I can count that far. One of them is my left hand and the other is my withered hand. Since I am not left handed I am obliged to write with my withered hand, and this is not easy, especially when it comes to forming certain words. Pause. That is a very hard word to write. Painful is the way in which I would describe it. It is a dull ache, deep in my groin. Why it hurts my groin I do not know. I understand to a certain extent why it hurts my hand, but it is an altogether different kind of pain in an altogether different place, and the relationship between the pain in my hand and the pain in my groin when I write the word pause is mysterious to me. It must be something to do with the shapes of the letters and the way in which they are organised in relation to one another. Having said that, I have never attempted to write the letters of the word pause together but in a different order than that in which they appear in the proper spelling. Uasep. Only the normal intensity of pain in my hand and nothing in my groin. So regarding the relationship between these two pains I am lost in the fog. On the other hand the pain in my groin may be unrelated to the pain in my hand and only by a string of highly improbable coincidences do they appear to be so. The whole business is a shame, for it is my favourite word to say. Only because of the sound. Why I consider it to be a shame I do not know. For to utter the word for the sake only of the sound is not the same as to write the word. I have no patience for its significance, and so when I say it, as I so frequently do, it is not for anything other than the joy that the sound brings to my ears. To write it brings me no joy. Only pain. There are other words too, words that do not cause so many problems. The wife taught me some. Anthropomorphism. That was one of them. I do not remember what it means. Something to do with man. From the Greek, I believe. The wife would know. She has a talent for words. Not so much now. She died whilst handing out leaflets. It was something to do with the cat. That’s right, information about the cat. It went missing. People came forward when they saw the leaflets. Some even bought animals with them, feral cats which they mistook for the cat. But the cat was not feral. Nor was it white. It was black, I believe. A black house cat went missing and all we could find were white feral cats. The wife and I each played our part. I made the leaflets. She handed them out. I dealt with the responses. This pattern repeated itself for some time. I do not remember how long. My memory is not what it used to be. There was a photocopier involved too. I remember that. Not only myself and the wife. The first leaflet took the longest. That is because I made it by hand and by that point the hand had become withered. So it cannot have been healthy, contrary to what I said before. I made it by writing on some paper. Then I took a photograph and I pasted it onto the paper, taking great care not to cover up any of the writing. Had it not been for the hand the whole process would have been easier. The hand would also have prevented me from photographing the cat. A photograph was of course required for the leaflet. How else would we expect people to identify the cat? But I could not have used the camera with my hand in such a condition. I put this to the wife, who very kindly offered to operate the camera for me. We spent quite some time searching for the cat so that we could photograph it, but it was nowhere to be found. In the end I was obliged to use a photograph of a cat different from the cat we were looking for. It was a white feral cat. Nothing like the cat. The house cat leaves and is replaced by the feral. I think it is still here somewhere. It comes and goes, as is the nature of cats. Always changing, are cats. At times they are present, then they are absent. This happened to the black house cat. At other times it goes the other way. During these times there is an absent cat which becomes present rather than a present cat which becomes absent. This happened to the white feral cat. It boggles the mind how some things go one way and also the other way, but other things go one and only one way, rather than that way and the other way too. And the things that go only one way sometimes go only one way because that is the only way they can go, whereas sometimes things that go only one way could just as well go the other way and even so do not. And things that go one way and not the other because the way they go is the only way they can go are said to go the way they go out of necessity. And the things that go only one way but could just as well go the other way are said to go the way in which they go and not the other out of contingency. And of all the things that go one way and also the other, some go the ways in which they go out of necessity and some go the ways in which they go out of contingency. And the things that go one way or the other or both, out of contingency, go the ways in which they go because it is possible for them to go those ways. And the things that go one way or the other or both, out of necessity, go the ways they go because it is possible for them to go those ways. And by the same token, it is impossible for the things that go one way or the other or both, out of necessity, to go any ways other than the ways in which they go. And again, for the things that go one way or the other or both, out of contingency, it is possible for them to go in ways other than the ways in which they go, for this is what it means for something to be contingent. And so we say that the wife, who taught me the meaning of the word contingent, being as talented with words as she was, cannot become a living person because the passage from life to death necessarily goes only one way, and it is impossible for it to go any way other than the way in which it goes. And we say that the cat can become a present cat having been an absent cat because the passage from presence to absence can also go the other way, from absence to presence, and the negotiation of this passage is contingent. And as for the hand, we do not know whether or not the passage from a healthy state to a withered state can also go the other way, from a withered state to a healthy state. And these considerations, while they offer to us a solution to the problem of the wife, do not offer us a solution to the problem of the cat or the problem of the hand. For whereas it was contingent that the wife died, but necessary that she remain in that state, we have no way of determining whether or not the cat will return to a state of presence from its current state of absence, or whether or not the hand will return to a state of health from its currently withered condition. Even more troubling is the possibility which I have so far suppressed, in order to prevent this train of thought from spiralling out of control, that is, that the hand does not go from its currently withered state to a more withered state, or from its currently withered state to a more healthy state, but rather remains in its current condition permanently, without change. And this possibility is not the worst of the three, nor is it the best, but is somewhere in between the worst and the best. And it has in fact been in such a condition now for quite some time, without change, sitting somewhere in between the worst possibility and the best possibility, having started with a fingernail and spreading, eventually engulfing the entire hand, for a long time without pause, then pausing for an equally long time. But enough of that. I will say it instead of writing it. For writing the word pause hurts my groin and my hand, whereas saying it brings me joy, for I like the sound of the word when I articulate it. But because the answers to the questions of the cat and the hand are currently indeterminable, they will remain a mystery until they become determinable, which is why I continue to articulate my favourite word and gaze at the photograph of the wife. For the answers to them either will or will not become evident, and whether or not they do, there will always be other questions for me to contemplate, equally impossible to answer, or at least as difficult, such as the question of the relationship between the pain in the hand and the pain in the groin, which itself gives rise to even more questions: 1. Why does the pain occur in my hand when I write the word pause? 2. Why does the pain occur in my groin when I write the word pause? 3. Why do the pain in my hand and the pain in my groin occur together, and not one sometimes, and the other at other times? 4. Does the writing of the word pause cause the pain in my hand, which in turn causes the pain in my groin, or is the causal relationship between the three elements of a different order? 5. Is there any relationship at all between the three elements or is it an illusion founded on the repetition of an improbable coincidence which arises from the chaotic excess of existence? 6. Why is there pain? 7. What is the meaning of question number five? 8. Why does the spoken word pause occur at the same time as joy and the written word pause occur at the same time as pain? Given the exponential proliferation of questions regarding the pain in the hand and the pain in my groin which arise from asking a single question, it is easy to imagine the difficulties one can encounter in attempting to answer even a single one of them. And it is true that I have not yet resolved the problem of how to begin, which seems to me to be the most challenging of all I have dealt with. But even if I do successfully resolve this problem there is no guarantee that the question of the cat, or of the hand, or any of the sub-questions which are derived from these, or the question of pain along with its own derivations, will ever reach a satisfactory conclusion. Whether or not this is itself a problem is a question in itself. And it is a question with which I may never find the time to engage.

Cold War Revisited: “The Thing”

As certain factions speculate that the world is headed toward a new Cold War, Mark Farnsworth examines the artistic legacy of this phenomenon.

“The Thing” is the darkest film in the Kurt Russell trilogy of Carpenter’s science fiction films and the beginning of his “Apocalypse” cycle. It is a master class of pessimism nearly unrivalled in cinema and a bleak critique on the nature of humanity itself, inspired by the Reagan administration, Carpenter’s first foray into studio film making, and the escalation of the arms race with the Soviet Union.

The plot is more closely related to John W. Campbell’s novella; “Who Goes There?” than the earlier Hawks production of “The Thing from another World.” Special effects allow the shape-shifting alien to be realised in all its bloody glory, which in turn gives Carpenter the freedom to develop a claustrophobic atmosphere of mistrust, fear, and growing nihilism.

In the earlier movie the scientists and soldiers work together to destroy the visible threat of the thing, as they would do with communism. There is a unity mostly derived from the fact that they are white and embody a people fresh from the moral victory in WW2. America in the 1950s was still perceived as the ‘good guys’, the ‘land of the free and the home of the brave’.

With Carpenter’s creature everyone could be the thing and, as a consequence, an enemy. Read More »

Two Eyes Show

Two eyes show two streets separate.
The one walks along normal, like it has
a day to live out. The other mimics it.
Forgets it. The other wanders about

smelling its own sidewalks and imagining
cars skimming the ground upside down. Read More »

The Damned, Hunters and Demons

Chloe Bradshaw is thirteen. This is her second publication with GlobalComment.

I have arrived in a house under cover of darkness. I can feel the hunger overwhelming me as I crawl upon the ceiling. I can hear voices in the other room. I try to hear what they are talking about, but then decide it’s pointless; humans lead boring lives. I sometimes I think that I am doing them a favour by killing them.

Killing them will at least stop them complaining about how dreadful their luck is. Ha! They have no idea about bad luck. I have a right mind to turn them into demons just now. Then they’ll see how rotten life can treat you!

I need to feed, however, and the hunger is uncontrollable. Maybe some other time, I think absentmindedly.

I hear the floorboards creak and look down to see a figure standing in the doorway.

“Hello,” I say in a particularly malicious voice.

“Who… who’s, there?” I hear an uncertain female voice answer. Read More »

The “N”

Please note than an audio version is now available below the text.

I have a friend who says the “N”:
A Whiteboy who’s crazy as sin.
“What up my ‘N’!?” when my call
Reaches him. “Nothing much, Homey,”
I reply with a subtle stall
In my mind: “Sticks and stones is all
It would take to break his bony
Ass. Read More »

The Deaths That Bind Us: Solzhenitsyn, Pugovkin, Mordyukova

It feels instinctive to say that the death of Alexander Solzhenitsyn marks an end of an era. Which era, though?

Solzhenitsyn’s life spanned many eras: WWII, the gulag, the Khrushchev years, stagnation, the last gasps of the Cold War, and, most recently, the strange and wondrous and bewildering reality of post-Soviet Russia. Solzhenitsyn’s legacy is crystal clear if one is looking at it from an outsider’s perspective. His legacy among his people and the people who love and study Russian literature and culture, however, is a much more complicated phenomenon.

In the West, Solzhenitsyn is most readily regarded as a symbol of All That Stalin Did Wrong. In today’s Russia and other post-Soviet countries he is a public figure whose function was and is debated, whose artistic achievements are criticized with gruffness rarely found elsewhere, and whose insistence on criticizing liberal democracy has earned him respect for the searing honesty with which he presented his views.

Living in the U.S., I have repeatedly run up against the sentiment that today Solzhenitsyn is intellectual Russia’s beloved grandmaster, a kindly, fatherly figure. The truth is, most people I know responded more emotionally when the likes of Nonna Mordyukova and Mikhail Pugovkin passed on earlier this summer - old school Soviet actors whose movies also serve as reminders of a time and a place gone forever.

The deaths of Mordyukova and Pugovkin did not, for the most part, make international headlines. But these figures were no less important in a cultural and historical context. Read More »

We, the Potheads

Please note that an audio verion of the poem is available below the text.

Rise and Shine,
Wake and Bake,
Eat the Cake
After some Shake ‘n Bake…

We, the Potheads, sure Love
Pissin’ Smokey off by Not
Bearing with Him:
Forrest fires everyday,
Forrest fires e’er’day.

It’s just a plant
Mr. Military Man,
Put Here for We,
Does you understand? Read More »

Messy Jesse

Please note:

An audio recording of this poem is available below the jump.

The poem is read by the author.

Enjoy.

- The Editor.

That’s just messy, Jesse,
You are not Kanye,
Though, your rhymes
Are on time,
You mucked up
Th’other day. Read More »

Mirror of the Arab World: A Review

This is a review of Mirror of the Arab World: Lebanon in Conflict by Sandra Mackey. W. W. Norton. 2008.

For more, please see Jonathan Mok’s interview with the author.

Why has the curse of assassination and war stuck to fates of Lebanon’s people? Why have the other Arab states recently intervened in the political deadlocks, resulting in the appointment of General Suleiman as the president? Why is Hezbollah is considered a terrorist organization, despite enjoying a wide popularity among the poor? Well, if you are interested in Lebanon, Sandra Mackey may very well be a great guide.

Instead of providing a journalistic account such as Thomas Friedman’s From Beirut to Jerusalem, Sandra Mackey, a veteran journalist, opts to offer a timely collection of facts so that her readers may gain more insight into Lebanon’s affairs.

The book attempts answers to questions such as “Why did the civil war take place?” “Why dp olitical and religious conflicts seem to have no end in Lebanon?”, and “Why have the United States, France, various Arab states, Israel and Iran have all been interested in meddling in the affairs of Lebanon?”

Mackey reveals the bare bones of an international religious conflict, wherein Lebanon’s people seek support from their brothers and sisters abroad, and foreign countries are too happy to “help.”

Who should be blamed? Mackey’s writing on this subject is elusive. But the elusiveness is compelling, because rather than adhere to media stereotypes, Mackey ultimately shows how everyone is responsible for the chaos in the country.

While Mackey doesn’t offer any immediate solutions to the religious strife in Lebanon, she illustrates the essential ingredients of a successful democratic society: a common identity and a secular institution recognized by everyone. The lack of common values, the precedence of religious and family interests over public welfare, the meddling of foreign powers which have been tried to impose their versions of Lebanon on its populace are presently preventing Lebanon from achieving such success.

Mackey’s work may not be comforting, but it is comprehensive, and it’s narrative, to borrow from the title, mirrors the general progress of conflict across the Middle East and beyond.

The Revenge, The Final Price

This is the final chapter of thirteen-year-old Chloe Bradshaw’s dark tale. For the previous installment, click here.

As I looked at my father’s murderer, the feeling of fear subsided and was overcome by anger. I lunged at the pirate and both Jay and Luke tried to hold me back. They just about managed to restrain me from ripping the man’s throat out. He ambled over with a silver jug in his hand.

I stood up straight as he came closer and brushed myself down.

“Can I help you?” He asked with a voice which made my blood curdle from both anger and fright. I didn’t answer him; I just couldn’t find my voice. I had the idea that neither could Jay and Luke could for they both didn’t breathe a word. The man looked even more menacing close up, like a shadow that could suffocate you.

“I tried to look in his eyes but I couldn’t bring myself to doing it. I swallowed as a cold sweat came over me. “I said-” He started, but I cut him off.

“You killed my father,” I finally said. Read More »